Scheme for preparation of multi-partite entanglement of atomic ensembles
Xue Peng†, , Bian Zhi-Hao
Department of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: gnep.eux@gmail.com

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11174052 and 11474049) and the China Advanced Science and Technology Innovation Fund.

Abstract
Abstract

We show a scheme of preparing multipartite W type of maximally entangled states among many atomic ensembles with the generation time increasing with the party number only polynomially. The scheme is based on laser manipulation of atomic ensembles and single-photon detection, and fits well the status of the current experimental technology. We also show one of the applications of this kind of W state, demonstrating Bell theorem without inequalities.

1. Introduction

Entanglement has been studied very extensively as it impacts both foundational as well as applied aspects of quantum theory.[1] Moreover, multi-partite entanglement plays a central role in a host of quantum technologies, including metrology, imaging, communication, and quantum information processing.[28] Many schemes for generation of the multi-particle entangled state have been proposed.[919] Among all the physical systems which have been considered for generating multi-particle entangled states, atomic ensembles are well developed and regarded as ideal candidates for quantum information processing, especially for quantum state engineering. Recently, breakthrough experimental achievements on atomic ensembles[2027] have been reported, which attracts more attention to this physical system.

We present a scheme of preparing multipartite W type of maximally entangled states among many atomic ensembles with the generation time increasing with the party number only polynomially. In addition, a proof of Bell theorem[28] without inequalities specifically for the W states can be realized experimentally. The scheme involves the following features: firstly, it is robust to realistic noise and imperfections. As a result, the physical requirements of this scheme are moderate and well fit the experimental technique. Secondly, in contrast to the belief that an entanglement preparation scheme based on post-selection will suffer from the fast exponential degradation of the efficiency,[9,10] we design this scheme with an efficient scaling and make it possible to maximally entangle many ensembles with the current technology. Finally, by making use of quantum memory available in atomic internal levels, the W states can be put into many applications such as demonstrating quantum non-locality, and a quantum channel for perfect teleportation.[29]

2. The protocol for preparation of the W-type multi-particle entangled states

Let us have a look at the generalized form |WM〉 of the W state in multi-qubit systems. In Ref. [30], the state is defined as

where |M − 1,1〉 denotes the totally symmetric state including M − 1 zeros and 1 one. For example, we obtain M = 3,

The basic element of this scheme is an ensemble of many identical alkali atoms with a Raman type Λ-level configuration coupled by a pair of optical fields, shown as Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. The relevant type Λ-level structure of the alkali atoms in the ensembles. A pair of meta-stable lower states |g〉 and |s〉 can be achieved, for example, in hyperfine or Zeeman sublevels of electronic ground states, and |e〉 is the excited state.

The experimental realization can be either a room-temperature dilute atomic gas[3133] and a sample of cold trapped atoms.[34,35] We continue to use the symbols and corresponding definitions shown in Refs. [36] and [37]. There are two kinds of laser pulses (pumping laser and repumping laser) applied to the atomic ensembles, which correspond to Raman transition |g〉 → |s〉 and anti-Raman transition |s〉 → |g〉, respectively. A weak pumping laser is shone on all atoms so that each atom has an equal small probability to be excited into the state |s〉 through the Raman transition. After the atomic gas interacts with the pumping laser, there will be a special atomic mode Ŝ called the symmetric collective atomic mode

where Na ≫ 1 is the total atom number. In particular, an emission of the single Stokes photon in a forward direction results in the state of atomic ensembles given by Ŝ|vac〉, where the ensemble ground state |vac〉 = ⊗i|gi. The scheme for preparation of W type of maximally entangled states between atomic ensembles works in the following way shown in Fig. 2. We choose the case in which three atomic ensembles are entangled in the W state |W123 shown as Eq. (2) by way of example.

Fig. 2. Setup of the modified preparation scheme. The classical pumping laser pulses are applied to the three atomic ensembles instantaneously. If either one of the detectors D2 and D3 clicks, the ensembles are entangled on the W state.

Firstly, the three atomic ensembles are prepared to the ground state |g〉, i.e., |vac〉123 = |vac〉1 ⊗|vac〉2 ⊗|vac〉3 and illuminated by the classical pumping laser pulses instantaneously. Each ensemble will be excited to be in the state Ŝ|vac〉 with probability pc. The forward scattering Stokes photons from optical excitations of the ensembles are combined at the three BSs with transmittances and reflectances Ti and Ri (here i = 1,2,3, and ) after some filters which filter out the pumping laser pulses, and the outputs are detected by three single-photon detectors. We find that through selecting the certain BSs with the proper transmittances and reflectances, the three ensembles are entangled in the W state if there is a click in either one of the detectors D2 and D3.

If the detector D1 clicks, the state of the atomic ensembles is given in

If the detector D2 clicks, the state is given in

Otherwise, if D3 clicks, the ensembles are put in the state shown as

Once the transmittances and reflectances of the BSs are chosen as and , there are only two cases in which either D2 or D3 clicks and D1 does not click and we can obtain the W state |W123 among the atomic ensembles.

To realize an arbitrary ratio of transmittance and reflectance of the BSs experimentally, one only needs to add a tunable quarter-wave plate (QWP) and half-wave plate (HWP) in front of the 50/50 BS, changing the circular polarization of the Stokes photons from optical excitation into linear polarization. That is, the Stokes photons are in T|H〉+eiφR|V〉, where H and V, respectively, represent the horizontal and vertical polarizations, and T, R, and φ are fixed by the relative inclination between the optical axes of the QWP and HWP. The outputs go through a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) before the single-photon detectors. By adjusting the optical axes of the QWP and HWP, one can obtain an arbitrary ratio of the Stokes photons from the optical excitation with the horizontal and vertical polarizations, respectively.

The scheme of generation of three-particle W-type entangled states can be extended to generate n-particle W states via BSs with proper transmittances and reflectances. If either of the detectors Di (i = 2,…,n) clicks, the rest and D1 do not click, we obtain an n-particle W state |Wn〉.

Now we calculate the efficiency of this scheme for preparing three-party W state. In the generation process, the dominant noise is the photon loss, which includes the contributions from the channel attenuation, the spontaneous emissions in the atomic ensembles, the coupling inefficiency of Stokes light into and out of the channel, and the inefficiency of the single-photon detectors which cannot perfectly distinguish between one and two photons. All the above noise is described by an overall loss probability η. Since the dominant realistic noise — loss of excitations — only has influence on the success probability to register an excitation from each ensemble, once the excitation is registered, we obtain a perfect W state (2). Hence, the entanglement preparation time should be t1 ∼ 3tΔ/2(1 − η)pc as high as that of the bipartite EPR state.[36] To entangle n ensembles in the W state, we only need more BSs with proper transmittances and reflectances and n single-photon detectors. However, the total generation time is approximated by TtΔ/[f(n)(1 − η)pc], where f(n) ≥ 1/n (n ≥ 3), which increases with n polynomially. Compared to the previous scheme of generation of W-type multi-particle entangled states,[9] in which the total generation time is ∼ t0/(1 − η)2n−1 and increases with the number of ensembles exponentially by the factor 1/[(1 − η)2pc], the efficiency of the present scheme is much improved.

Also with the noise, the state of the ensembles is actually described by

where the vacuum coefficient cn is basically given by the conditional probability for the inherent mode-mismatching noise contribution and ρvac stands for the vacuum component with no excitation in the ensembles. As we mentioned before, the dominant realistic noise is loss of excitations which only has influence on the success probability to register an excitation from each ensemble, the coefficient cn can be estimated from the decoherence rate which is caused by the imperfection of the interferometer built by BSs and the imperfections of the optical elements. We use three-qubit W state as an example. The accuracy of each BS with an arbitrary ratio of transmittance and reflectance which is implemented by wave-plates, 50/50 BS and PBSs is about 0.997. The visibility of the interferometer built by three BSs with certain ratios of transmittance and reflectance can reach 0.993.[38] Thus the fidelity of the three-qubit W state can be estimated numerically as about 0.989.

We briefly discuss the practical implication of this proposal. With the improved scheme, for example, we can generate a high fidelity W entanglement over n = 20 ensembles in a time T ∼ 300 μs with a notable loss η ∼ 1/3 and a typical choice of pc ∼ 0.01, tΔ ∼ 1/fp, where fp = 10 MHz is the repetition frequency of the Raman pulses. With such a short preparation time, the noise that we have not included, such as the non-stationary phase, drift induced by the pumping laser or by the optical channel, the single bit rotation error (< 10−4) and the dark count probability (about 10−5 in a typical detection time window 0.1 μs) of the single-photon detectors can be negligible.

3. Demonstration of Bell theorem

Since the W state shown in Eq. (2) is entangled in the Fock basis, it is experimentally hard to do certain single-bit rotation. In the following we will show how the W state can be used to realize the communication protocols, such as demonstration of quantum non-locality, with simple experimental configurations shown as Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Schematic setup for the realization of demonstration of Bell theorem with the W state.

The first step is to share an EPR type of entangled state

(here Λ = U, M, D) between three pairs of distant ensembles U2 and U3, M2 and M3, D2 and D3. Then the other ensembles U1, M1, and D1 are prepared in the W state

shown in Eq. (2). Through the post-selection technique, the product state of the whole system ∏Λ |ψΛ2Λ3⊗|WU1M1D1 can be easily prepared, and whenever it is put into application, the effective “polarized” W state is yielded. In analogy to the language for photons, we can define a basis of the “polarization” qubit from the states

where |vac〉Λ = |vac〉Λ1Λ2Λ3. In the expansion of the product state, there are only three components which have one and only one excitation on each pair of ensembles Λ1 and Λ2. This component state is given by

which is exactly the three-particle W type of maximally entangled state in the “polarization” basis. Note that for any practical application of the W type of entanglement, the state preparation should be succeeded by a measurement of the “polarization” of the excitation on each pair of ensembles Λ1 and Λ2, which can be done for our system by combining single-bit rotation (such as “σx”) and the number detection of the single photon detectors.

The preparation of the EPR state is probabilistic, however, due to the available quantum memory provided by the meta-stable atomic mode Ŝ, the preparation time of the state is at most 3t0 if the EPR states are prepared one by one, and can be reduced to t0 if the EPR states are prepared independently at the same time. Also, the W state is prepared synchronously with the generation time t1 > t0. After the preparation of the product state, the projection efficiency (success probability) from the product state to the effective “polarized” W state is given by (1 − η)3/8. So the total time from registering the three-party “polarized” W entanglement is T ∼ 8t1/(1 − η)3.

To demonstrate quantum non-locality, firstly, we perform an operation “σx” on each of the three qubits resulting in the value xΛ ∈ {1, −1} with equal probability. The repumping lasers with the frequencies ωrepump are applied on the ensembles Λ1 and Λ2, respectively, and the outputs are combined at the 50/50 BSs. We only consider the cases in which there is one excitation on each pair of ensembles Λ1 and Λ2. If a forward scattering Stokes photon is detected by the detector , we get the value xΛ = 1; otherwise, if the detector clicks, the result of the operation is −1. At the same time, we prove that the state preparation succeeds. Then we go on with the next step. Otherwise, we repeat all the above process until we succeed. For the operation “σz”, we perform a repumping laser on the ensembles Λ3. If the detector clicks, we assume zΛ = 1; otherwise, if there is no photon detected, the value is −1. According to Ref. [28], the proof can be presented in the relevant properties of the W state

where i, j, k ∈ {U, M, D} and ijk. PW (zi = −1, zj = −1) means the probability of two qubits giving the result −1 when measuring σz on all three qubits, and PW (xj = xk|zi = −1) means the conditional probability of σx j and σxk having the same result given that the result of σzi is −1. In EPR’s criterion of elements of reality, the equation xi = xj = xk is always satisfied. However, according to quantum mechanics, when measuring σx on all qubits, we get the probability 3/4. Then we can easily realize a proof of Bell theorem for the W state in experiment.

4. Conclusion

Finally, we have a brief conclusion. In this paper, we describe a scheme of preparation of entangling many atomic ensembles in the W type of maximally entangled states through laser manipulation. Remarkably, the generation time increases with the party number only polynomially. Due to the efficient scaling of this scheme, one can use it to steadily entangle many atomic ensembles in the W state with the current experimental technology. Hence, such an extraordinary possibility opens up prospects for many exciting experiments and applications.

Reference
1Einstein ARosen NPodolsky B 1935 Phys. Rev. 47 777
2Nielsen M AChuang I L2000Quantum Computation and Quantum InformationCambridgeCambridge University Press
3Horodecki RHorodecki PHorodecki MHorodecki K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 865
4Gühne OTóth G 2009 Phys. Rep. 474 1
5Tang BQin HZhang RLiu J MXue P 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 050307
6Xue PFicek ZSanders B C 2012 Phys. Rev. 86 043826
7Xue PZhou X F2008Phys. Lett. A372632
8Xue P 2012 Chin. Phys. 21 100306
9Xue PGuo G C 2003 Phys. Rev. 67 034302
10Xue PGuo G C 2003 Phys. Lett. 319 225
11Xue PGuo G C 2004 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 21 1358
12Gao YZhou HZou DPeng XDu J 2013 Phys. Rev. 87 032335
13Perez-Leija AHernandez-Herrejon J CMoya-Cessa HSzameit AChristodoulides D N 2013 Phys. Rev. 87 013842
14Sweke RSinayskiy IPetruccione F 2013 Phys. Rev. 87 042323
15Xue PSanders B C 2010 Phys. Rev. 82 085326
16Lin X MXue PChen M YChen Z HLi X H 2006 Phys. Rev. 74 052339
17Han CXue PGuo G C 2005 Phys. Rev. 72 034301
18Pavel Lvan Enk S JChoi K SPapp S BDeng HKimble H J 2009 New J. Phys. 11 063029
19Xue PZhan XBian Z H 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 7623
20Ding D SZhou Z YShi B SGuo G C 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2527
21Zhang S CLiu CZhou S YChuu CLoy M M TDu S W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 263601
22Vanderbruggen TKohlhaas RBertoldi ABernon SAspect ALandragin ABouyer P 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 210503
23Behbood NColangelo GCiurana F MNapolitano MSewell R JMitchell M W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 103601
24Behbood NCiurana F MColangelo GNapolitano MTóth GSewell R JMitchell M W 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 093601
25Ding D SZhang WZhou Z YShi SXiang G YWang X SJiang Y KShi B SGuo G C 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 050502
26Choi K SGoban APapp S BVan Enk S JKimble H K 2010 Nature 468 412
27Papp S BKyung S CDeng HPavel Lvan Enk S JKimble H J 2009 Science 324 764
28Cabello A 2002 Phys. Rev. 65 032108
29Gorbachev V NTrubilko A IPodichkina AZhiliba A 2003 Phys. Lett. 314 267
30Dür WVidal GCriac J I 2000 Phys. Rev. 62 062314
31Julsgard BKozhekin APolzik E S 2001 Nature 413 400
32Phillips D FFleischhauer AMair AWalsworth R LLukin M D 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 783
33Jiang WHan CXue PDuan L MGuo G C 2004 Phys. Rev. 69 043819
34Liu CDutton ZBehroozi C HHau L V 2001 Nature 409 490
35Roch J FVigneron KGrelu PhSinatra APoizat J PhGrangier Ph 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 634
36Duan L MLukin M DCirac J IZoller P 2001 Nature 414 413
37Duan L M 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 170402
38Xue PQin HTang BZhan XBian Z HLi J 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 110307